Link to jeanne's Birdie Page Self-Test Quiz: Edwin Lemert's Secondary Deviance

Dear Habermas Logo and Link to Site Index A Justice Site



Criminology Concepts
HOME

Created: October 25, 1998
Latest update: January 5, 2001
E-Mailjeanne

jeanne's lecture notes on self-test quiz on:

Duncan Kennedy's Response to the Hierarchy of Authority

Source: Kairys, Politics of Law. Chapter by Duncan Kennedy of First-Year at Harvard Law and the dominance and arrogance of hierarchy in institutional bureaucracy. To return to self-test quiz click here.
Lemert, in his theory of secondary deviance, says that:

  1. Which of the following statements best describe Kennedy's attitude towards his first-year law students at Harvard?

    1. Kennedy expects any Harvard student to be able to recognize and resist the puffed up bull frogs of the academy hierarchy.

      Not so. On p. 61 he recognizes that: "It would be an extraordinary first-year student who could, on his own, develop a theoretically critical attitude toward this system."

    2. Kennedy believes that students are entitled to tough exams that will allow them to excel competitively.

      Not so. On p. 65, Kennedy says that "A more rational system would emphasize the way to learn law rather than rules, and skills rather than answers,' making students less competitive and more equal.

    3. Kennedy believes that even at Harvard most students are weak, lazy, incompetent, and insecure.

      Not so. On p. 65 Kennedy explicitly excoriates law school and "the educational system as a whole" for giving such an impression to its students. Note that he said "as a whole." That includes us, folks.

    4. Kennedy believes that most liberal students rely on rights discourse to deny the hierarchical arrogance of the law school and defend their liberal beliefs.

      True. On p. 62 he notes that this is a fallacy that assumes an adversarial system. The "rights" framework is, he says, "a part of the problem rather than of the solution.

    5. There are no "real" liberal students at Harvard.

      Not so. He discusses the liberal issue on pp. 61-2.